Els of socioeconomic status and breast cancer risk elements; Univariate analysisVariable SES II vs.SES I OR self-assurance interval pvalue SES III vs.SES I OR self-assurance interval pvalue SES IV vs.SES I OR self-confidence interval pvalueAge . … … .. … … . . … … . .Referent .Referent .Referent Marital Status . … … .Single .Referent .Referent .Referent Married Loved ones history . ……. .Yes .Referent .Referent .Referent No No.. … … .Pregnancy .. … .No.Abortion . .Breast . … … .feeding (duration) Fatty eating plan . … … .Yes .Referent .Referent .Referent No Smoking . … … .Yes .Referent .Referent .Referent No Poor socioeconomic status has regarded as the base.Important variables have Sodium laureth manufacturer indicated with ……..decreased by improving socioeconomic status.It has meant that the odds of excellent socioeconomic PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21591972 status have decreased by growing number in counting the pregnancies (CI.).Also, the odds of outstanding socioeconomic status has decreased by increasing number in counting the pregnancies .In accordance with table , the associations amongst socioeconomic status and number of pregnancies, number of abortions and smoking had been substantial.To acquire this clearly, the results of Many Logistic Regression have stated o The odds of moderate socioeconomic status have decreased by growing one particular quantity in counting the pregnancies (CI. ).o The odds of excellent socioeconomic status have decreased by growing a single number in counting the pregnancies (CI.).o The odds of superb socioeconomic status have decreased by escalating onenumber in counting the pregnancies (CI.).o The odds of great socioeconomic status have elevated by growing one number in counting the abortions (CI).o The odds of moderate socioeconomic status in smokers have decreased in comparison with nonsmoker persons (CI.).The odds of superior socioeconomic status in smokers have decreased in comparison with nonsmoker people (Cl.).DiscussionBased around the results of this study, the imply age of patients was .years and .in the sufferers had been younger than years.Within the study of Yavari et al the mean age of individuals was . that could be comparable to this research .The imply age of sufferers was .yearsIranian Journal of Cancer PreventionRelationships between Household Levels of Socioeconomic Status and Distribution ..Table .Multinomial Logistic Regression test result in partnership among household levels of socioeconomic status and breast cancer threat factors; a number of analysesVariable SES II vs.SES I OR confidence interval pvalue SES III vs.SES I OR self-assurance interval pvalue SES IV vs.SES I OR confidence interval pvalueAge . … … .. … … . . … … . .Referent .Referent .Referent Marital Status . … … .Single .Referent .Referent .Referent Married Loved ones history . … … .Yes .Referent .Referent .Referent No No.. … … .Pregnancy .. … .No.Abortion . .Breast . … … .feeding (duration) Fatty eating plan . … … .Yes .Referent .Referent .Referent No Smoking . … … .Yes .Referent .Referent .Referent No Poor socioeconomic status has regarded as the base.Substantial variables have indicated with ……..(SD) in Akbari et al.study and in Ebrahimi et al.study the mean age of sufferers was .years and % of sufferers had been younger than years .In line with the results of this study in Univariate Analysis, a substantial association between loved ones socioeconomic status and age at cancer diagnosis among individuals has detected (p worth).It has meant that am.