Old income.Psychological well getting Psychological wellbeing was measured by Persian version of Goldberg’s General Well being Questionnaire (GHQ), which was used widely in Iran .The GHQ was created by Goldberg and Hillier in plus the products yield 4 robust components with acceptable psychometric properties somatic symptoms (e.g run down), anxiety insomnia (e.g lost sleep more than worry), social dysfunction (e.g taking longer more than things), and sever depression (e.g life not worth living).The subscales represented dimensions of symptomatology but do not necessarily correspond to psychiatric diagnosis.A total score served as a broad index of psychopathology and for identifying caseness with GHQ, the total sub scales was used.All items possess a point scoring method that ranges from a ‘betterhealthier than normal’ choice, by means of a ‘same as usual’ as well as a ‘worse far more than usual’ to a ‘much worsemore than usual’Iranian J Publ Wellness, Vol No , pp.alternative.The uncomplicated Likert method scoring was applied and respondents with score or more was identified as psychological caseness .The psychometric properties on the Persian version of GHQ happen to be acceptable .As an illustration, a reliability coefficient was calculated for GHQ ( a ) which demonstrated that the GHQ was internally consistent.SelfEsteem The Persian version of your Rosenberg SelfEsteem scale (RSE) which is an try to accomplish a onedimensional measure of international selfesteem was made use of.It was designed to become a Gutman scale, which implies that the RSE items had been to represent a continuum of selfworth statements ranging from statements which are endorsed even by people with low selfesteem to statements that are endorsed only by persons with higher selfesteem.Rosenberg scored his question scale that was presented with 4 response options, ranging from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree”, as a sixitem Guttman scale.The ratings sum assigned to each of the items following reverse scoring the alpha-MCPG In Vitro positively worded products.Scores range from to , with larger scores indicating higher selfesteem.Rosenberg in demonstrated that his scale was a Guttman scale by getting higher sufficient reproducibility and scalability coefficients .The Persian version of RSE has shown great levels of reliability and validity .A reliability coefficient was calculated for the RSE ( a ).This outcome revealed that the Persian version of RSE was internally consistent.Perceived well being locus of manage We applied MHLCForm A, developed by Wallston, Wallston and DeVellis in .Validity and reliability in the Persian version have assessed by the authors .The results revealed that Persian version of Kind A had been acceptable and respectable.Kind A of the MHLC scales consists of things and consists of three subscales, namely PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21600947 Internal Health Locus of Control (IHLC), Strong Other people Well being Locus of Control (PHLC), and Likelihood Wellness Locus of Handle (CHLC).Eachof these subscales consists of six things using a sixpoint Likert response scale ranging from ‘Strongly Agree’ (scored as six) to ‘Strongly Disagree’ (scored as one particular).Scales are scored by summing respective items for a total scale score.Greater scores reflect stronger endorsement of MHLC scales .Internal HLC refers for the extent that private behavioral factors are responsible for one’s health or illness; Strong Others HLC encompasses the degree to which one’s well being is influenced by other folks for example, by physicians or other healthcare professionals; and Possibility HLC taps one’s belief that his well being is dependent upon likelihood, luck, or.