Ulls spent significantly additional time brows0.050) 4). In the In season, bulls spent significantly a lot more time browsing then p 0.050) 16.859, p 0.050) (Figure 4). In the dry season, bulls spent considerably far more time brow ing then (n = 408,(n == 401, t-value t-value = 40.726, p 0.050) (Figure 4). Similarly, the six 408, df grazing grazing df grazing = 401, = 40.726, p t-value = (Figure p 0.050) (Figure six Similarly, the ing then (n = 408, df = 401, 0.050) 40.726, 4). Similarly, the four). bulls bulls spent substantially much more grazing more than browsing inside the wet season (n = 448, df = 441, (n = 448, df spent significantly extra time time grazing over browsing inside the wet season wet season = = 448, d bulls spent NSC405640 Inhibitor drastically a lot more time grazing over browsing in the (n 441, t-value= 39.239,0.050) (Figure 4). 4). p t-value= 39.239, t-value=0.050) (Figure 441, p 39.239, p 0.050) (Figure 4).Figure four. Boxplot depicting the percentage time spent foraging (broken down into grazing and browsing) in the dry Figure four. Boxplot depicting the percentage time spent foraging (broken down into grazing and browsing) inside the dry and wet season. Quantity ofFigure four. Boxplot depicting the percentage time spent foragingbetween groups. observations = 428. Indicates statistically significant differences (broken down into grazing and wet season. Quantity of observations and wetIndicates Quantity of observations = 428. Indicates groups. and browsing) inside the dry = 428. season. statistically significant differences among statistically important differences amongst groups.Animals 2021, 11, 3070 Animals 2021, 11, 3070 Animals 2021, 11,8 of 13 eight 13 eight ofof3.2. QO 58 Autophagy Association 3.2. Association 3.two. Association Lone elephant bulls spent considerably more time foraging when in comparison to focal Lone elephant bulls spent drastically more time foraging when compared to focal Lone elephant bulls spent considerably a lot more time foraging when in comparison with focal bulls who had been foraging alongside females, irrespective of whether other males have been present bulls who have been foraging alongside females, no matter regardless of whether other males have been prebulls who were foraging alongside females, no matter no matter if other males have been preor not (nnot (n = 428, df =t-value = 33.790, p 0.050)0.050) (Figure 5). When thebulls had been = 428, df = 417, (Figure 5). When sent or not (n = 428, df = 417, t-value = 33,790, p 0.050) (Figure 5). the focal focal bulls sent or 417, t-value = 33,790, p When the focal bulls within the inside the presence of bulls, in addition they spent substantially more time foraging compared had been presence of other other bulls, they also spent considerably additional time foraging comwere in the presence of other bulls, additionally they spent considerably additional time foraging comto after they were connected with females (regardless of irrespective of whether or not or notbulls have been pared to when they had been connected with females (regardless of no matter if other other bulls pared to after they had been related to females (irrespective of irrespective of whether or not other bulls present along along females) (n = 428, 428, df = 417, t-value 34.071, p p 0.050)(Figure five). 417, t-value = 0.050) have been present with with females) (n = df = df = 417, t-value= 34,071, 0.050)(Figure 5). were present along with females) (n = 428, = 34,071, p (Figure five). Additional especially, focal bulls didn’t commit considerably a lot more or much less time grazing when Much more particularly, focal bulls did not devote drastically extra or significantly less time grazing when More particularly, focal bulls did not spend signi.