Nite element model. Table 1. Validation Oxalic acid dihydrate Biological Activity results for the finite element model.
Nite element model. Table 1. Validation results for the finite element model. Table 1. Validation final results for the finite element model. Table 1. Validation outcomes for the finite element model. Nature Frequency/Hz Relative Nature Frequency/Hz Mode Shape Relative ErNature Frequency/Hz Relative ErNature Frequency/Hz Relative ErMode Shape Mode Shape Error/ Nature Frequency/Hz Benefits Relative ErMode Shape Test Results Computationalror/ ror/ ror/ ror/Mode Shape9 of111272.94 272.94 272.94 272.94 272.1st order bend1st order 1st order bend1st order bend284.90 four.38 284.90 four.38 284.90 4.38 1st order bend284.90 4.38 bending ing ing 284.90 4.38 ing Table 1. Validation benefits for the finite element model. ing Mode ShapeMode No.Nature Frequency/Hz Relative Error/ Test Benefits Computational Results2 22 two 1956.94 956.94 956.94 956.94 272.94 956.1006.80 1006.80 1006.80 1006.80 284.90 1006.five.21 five.21 five.21 5.21 four.38 5.1st order tor1st order tor1st order tor1st order tor1st order torsion 1st order bendsion sion sion ing sion3 33 three 21283.13 1283.13 1283.13 1283.13 956.94 1283.1256.50 1256.50 1256.50 1256.50 1006.80 1256.2.08 two.08 two.08 two.08 five.21 2.2nd order bend2nd order bend2nd 2nd order 1storder bendorder tor2nd order bending ing bending ing sion ing4 44 32133.93 2133.93 2133.93 2133.93 1283.13 2133.1950.60 1950.60 1950.60 1950.60 1256.50 1950.eight.59 8.59 eight.59 eight.59 two.08 8.Bending-torsion Bending-torsion Bending-torsion 2nd order bendBendingBending-torsion composite composite composite torsioncomposite ing composite5 five four 552752.60 2752.60 2752.60 2133.93 2752.60 2752.3011.20 3011.20 3011.20 1950.60 3011.20 3011.9.39 9.39 9.39 eight.59 9.39 9.2nd order tor2nd order tor2nd order torBending-torsion 2nd2nd order order torsion sion sion composite torsion sion2752.3.two. Flow Field Modeling and Verification three.two. Flow Field Modeling and Verification 3.two. Flow Field Modeling and Verification 3.two. Flow Field Modeling and Verification three.2. Flow Field Modeling and Verification In line with the above structural dynamic evaluation, the rotating blade made the According to the above structural dynamic evaluation, the rotating blade developed the In line with the above structural dynamic analysis, the rotating blade developed the In accordance with the above structural dynamic torAccording(S)-Venlafaxine Neuronal Signaling excitation to transform the 2nd orderanalysis, the rotating blade created the towards the above analysis, the rotating blade made aerodynamic excitation to structural dynamicdeformation and, moreover, to affectthe aerodynamic excitation to transform the blade deformation and, additionally, to impact the aerodynamic modify the blade deformation and, moreover, to have an effect on the blade the 3011.20 9.39 aerodynamic excitationfatigue damage.blade deformation and, furthermore, to was constructed to alter the For that reason, the CFD model on the blade impact the aerodynamic excitation to transform the bladesion deformation and, in addition, to affect the vibration response and fatigue damage. Consequently, the CFD model of your blade was constructed vibration response and fatigue harm. As a result, the CFD model with the blade was constructed vibration response and vibration in Figure 6 fatigue damage. Therefore, the CFD model flow field was constructed blade was built vibration response and tofatigue harm. For that reason, excitation. Theof the field parameters as shown response and confirm the aerodynamicthe CFD model flow blade parameters as shown in Figure 6 to confirm the aerodynamic excitation. The of thefield parameters as shown in Figure six to.