A have been cleaned in the database and introduced into the application IBM SPSS22.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) to be able to build the data matrix. This approach of critique and transcription was performed all through by the principal investigator with all the aim of guaranteeing appropriate information handling, whilst in the same time avoiding mistakes because of data omission or incorrect assignment. two.four. Data Analysis Data evaluation was performed using the statistical package IBM SPSS22.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Specifically, frequencies, suggests, standard deviations and percentages had been utilised for the analysis of the standard descriptive information. Alternatively, associative analyses employed one-way ANOVA, the Bonferroni test for between-group associations and bivariate Pearson correlations. So that you can examine the significance of associations amongst variables, the Pearson chi-squared test (0.05 ; 0.01 ; 0.000 ) and Welch test had been employed. Information normality was evaluated based on the values of kurtosis, with values decrease than two getting expected. Homoscedasticity was examined applying the Levene test. Ultimately, a univariate linear model was utilized to identify the influence of all variables on the general physical self-concept. This serves to highlight that the internal reliability of the instruments applied was evaluated through Cronbach’s alpha, establishing a 95.5 reliability index. three. Results Table 1 shows the basic descriptive information of your variables beneath study. Particularly, it was observed that 50.four (n = 832) in the subjects had been guys, even though 49.six (n = 818) had been females. In relation to the tertiles established for physical activity, 34.five (n = 570) showed a low level, though 51.two (n = 844) had a medium level and 14.3 (n = 236) a high level. Diet program 2-Furoylglycine Protocol categorization revealed that 23.three (n = 385) had a low-quality diet program, 49.eight (n = 821) of medium top quality and 26.9 (n = 444) of higher excellent. Finally, the mean values of selfconcept and its dimensions are shown, observing in the highest to lowest score: SF-G (22.25 five.88), SF-PAT (21.34 five.77), SF-PA (20.82 five.20), SF-PC (20.35 5.68) and SF-PS (19.21 five.23). The general self-concept obtained a value of 23.28 four.96. Table two presents PF-07321332 Cancer scores for physical self-concept and its dimensions in accordance with physical activity level. In both cases, a growing and positive trend is seen with increasing sport engagement. Concretely, information obtained for the dimension describing general selfconcept had been larger when young people today practiced more physical activity. Exactly the same pattern was seen with the dimensions pertaining towards the basic physical self-concept, physical capacity, physical condition, physical attractiveness and strength. In fact, Table 1 showsChildren 2021, 8,six ofhigher mean values for each dimension of physical self-concept for the “high” category, followed by the medium and low levels.Table 1. Descriptive data on the sample.Frequency (n) Gender Men Ladies Low Tertiles of physical activity Medium High Low Tertiles of diet regime high quality Medium Higher 832 818 570 844 236 385 821 444 Imply Score SF-PA SF-PC Self-concept SF-PAT SF-PS SF-G GS 20.82 20.35 21.34 19.21 22.25 23.28 Percentage 50.4 49.six 34.5 51.two 14.3 23.three 49.8 26.9 Regular Deviation (SD) 5.20 5.68 5.77 five.23 5.88 four.Note: GS, common self-concept; SF-G, common physical self-concept; SF-PA, physical potential; SF-PC, physical condition; SF-PAT, physical attractiveness; SF-PS, physical strength.Table 2. The levels of physical self-concept in line with the levels of physical activity.PA Level Low GS M.