S of a target word’s presentation, they were instructed to respond more quickly (Karpinski Steinman, 2006; see also Greenwald, Nosek Banaji, 2003). Procedure Participants signed up for convenient times to complete the study using an Internet-based system. Upon arriving at the laboratory, they first read and signed an informed consent, and then completed the SC-IAT. Subsequently, participants completed an online battery of questionnaires containing the demographics form, DEQ, IDI, IDD-L, BDI-II, BIDR, and PAI, in that order. Presenting the SC-IAT first prevented that measure from being impacted by participant responses to the subsequent self-reports, although since measure order was uniform, responses to earlier scales could have some impact on later responses. Upon completion of this battery, participants received research credits, were thanked for their participation, and were fully debriefed.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript ResultsMeans and standard deviations were calculated for each variable, as were indicators required to check for assumptions such as normality, skewness, and kurtosis. All variables’ means and standard deviations were consistent with previously reported data. Each variable was found to be normally distributed and to meet necessary assumptions (see descriptive statistics in Table 1). Bivariate correlations were computed among all variables of interest, as were coefficient alphas to examine internal consistency. All zero-order correlations and alphas are displayed in Table 1. Of note, all self-report dependency indices were significantly correlated with each other, and all were independent of implicit dependency. Further, all self-reported dependency indices were inversely correlated with both impression management and selfdeception scores. As expected, both order DS5565 self-deception and impression management were independent of implicit dependency. Gender Differences in Dependency A series of t-tests were conducted to examine whether gender differences existed on any dependent variables of interest. Several PAI indices were found to differ by gender, with men scoring significantly higher than women on Mania, t(113) = 2.52, p = .01, d = .49,J Pers Assess. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 February 21.Cogswell et al.PageSchizophrenia, t(115) = 2.93, p < .01, d = .56, Antisocial Features, t(115) = 4.52, p < .01, d = .82, and Alcohol Problems, t(117) = 2.76, p < .01, d = .48 (missing data from several participants precluded calculation of all PAI subscales for all participants, accounting for varying degrees of freedom). All other comparisons were non-significant (ps > .05). A series of t-tests were performed to examine whether implicit dependency or any of the self-report measures differed by gender. Contrary to expectations, there were no gender differences in responses to any of these measures (all ps > .20; see Table 2 for means and effect sizes). Associations Cibinetide solubility between Dependency and Depression To examine relations between dependency indicators and depression, bivariate correlations were computed between all self-report and implicit dependency indices and both past and concurrent depression. It was anticipated that neediness, but not connectedness, would be significantly associated with concurrent depressive symptoms and past depressive episodes. The correlation matrix, as well as descriptive statistics for continuous depression measures, are reproduced in Table 3. As shown i.S of a target word’s presentation, they were instructed to respond more quickly (Karpinski Steinman, 2006; see also Greenwald, Nosek Banaji, 2003). Procedure Participants signed up for convenient times to complete the study using an Internet-based system. Upon arriving at the laboratory, they first read and signed an informed consent, and then completed the SC-IAT. Subsequently, participants completed an online battery of questionnaires containing the demographics form, DEQ, IDI, IDD-L, BDI-II, BIDR, and PAI, in that order. Presenting the SC-IAT first prevented that measure from being impacted by participant responses to the subsequent self-reports, although since measure order was uniform, responses to earlier scales could have some impact on later responses. Upon completion of this battery, participants received research credits, were thanked for their participation, and were fully debriefed.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript ResultsMeans and standard deviations were calculated for each variable, as were indicators required to check for assumptions such as normality, skewness, and kurtosis. All variables’ means and standard deviations were consistent with previously reported data. Each variable was found to be normally distributed and to meet necessary assumptions (see descriptive statistics in Table 1). Bivariate correlations were computed among all variables of interest, as were coefficient alphas to examine internal consistency. All zero-order correlations and alphas are displayed in Table 1. Of note, all self-report dependency indices were significantly correlated with each other, and all were independent of implicit dependency. Further, all self-reported dependency indices were inversely correlated with both impression management and selfdeception scores. As expected, both self-deception and impression management were independent of implicit dependency. Gender Differences in Dependency A series of t-tests were conducted to examine whether gender differences existed on any dependent variables of interest. Several PAI indices were found to differ by gender, with men scoring significantly higher than women on Mania, t(113) = 2.52, p = .01, d = .49,J Pers Assess. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 February 21.Cogswell et al.PageSchizophrenia, t(115) = 2.93, p < .01, d = .56, Antisocial Features, t(115) = 4.52, p < .01, d = .82, and Alcohol Problems, t(117) = 2.76, p < .01, d = .48 (missing data from several participants precluded calculation of all PAI subscales for all participants, accounting for varying degrees of freedom). All other comparisons were non-significant (ps > .05). A series of t-tests were performed to examine whether implicit dependency or any of the self-report measures differed by gender. Contrary to expectations, there were no gender differences in responses to any of these measures (all ps > .20; see Table 2 for means and effect sizes). Associations between Dependency and Depression To examine relations between dependency indicators and depression, bivariate correlations were computed between all self-report and implicit dependency indices and both past and concurrent depression. It was anticipated that neediness, but not connectedness, would be significantly associated with concurrent depressive symptoms and past depressive episodes. The correlation matrix, as well as descriptive statistics for continuous depression measures, are reproduced in Table 3. As shown i.