462) = 4.174, p < .001, 2 = .051). Further simple effects analysis is shown in Fig 4. The dependent variable was the D-value of motivation between each type of emotioninducing videos and those inducing neutrality. The figure shows that the emotions of sadness, disgust, horror, and anger induced avoidance motivation compared with neutrality, and the emotions of surprise, amusement, and pleasure induced approach motivation compared with neutrality. Gender TAK-385MedChemExpress TAK-385 Differences were evidenced by women exhibiting higher avoidance motivation for the horror-inducing videos (M = -3.145, SD = 1.32 versus M = -2.259, SD = 1.782; p < .002) and disgust-inducing videos (M = -3.471, SD = .994 versus M = -2.431, SD = 1.677; p < .002). Table 1 summarizes the gender differences for emotional expressivity and emotional experience for each type of emotion.DiscussionThis study extends previous studies on gender differences in emotional responses evaluated according to emotional experience and emotional expressivity. We observed gender differences in emotional responses and found that they depend on specific emotion types but not valence. Women show relatively stronger emotional expressivity, whereas men have stronger emotional experiences with angry and positive stimuli. The self-report results are identical to those reported in several previous studies. Women often report more intense emotional responses [25], particularly for negative emotions [30]. Women in the present study reported higher arousal compared with men on most emotion types. Women also reported lower valence, higher arousal, and stronger avoidance motivationPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0158666 June 30,7 /Gender Differences in Emotional ResponseFig 4. The D-value of motivation between each type of emotion-inducing videos and those inducing neutrality of men and women. Statistical significance: *p<.002. Unless marked with an asterisk, no significant differences between these groups were found. Dis: disgust, hor: horror, ang: anger, sur: surprise, amu: amusement, ple: pleasure. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158666.gon disgust and horror emotions. The physiological results, such as the decline in HR while watching emotional stimulus, are also highly similar to those reported in previous studies [4,10,11]. This decline reflects the orientation, sustained attention, and action preparation of the viewers [10]. However, Nutlin (3a)MedChemExpress Nutlin-3a chiral regardless of the valence, men exhibited a larger decline in HR than did women. In contrast to our results, Fern dez et al. [3] reported a positive correlation between HR and arousal. In the present study, we found no correlation between the subjective assessmentTable 1. Gender differences for emotional expressivity and emotional experience. emotional expressivity Valence anger amusement pleasure horror disgust sadness surprise “-” means no gender difference. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158666.t001 womenmen women>men women>men women>men women>men women>men Motivation avoidance: women>men avoidance: women>men emotional experience Heart rate decline: men>women decline: men>women decline: men>women -PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0158666 June 30,8 /Gender Differences in Emotional Responsescores and physiological responses, regardless of the type of emotion or the gender of the participant. According to Evers et al. [21], emotional experience and emotional expressivity belong to different reaction systems. The inconsistency between these two aspects is underst.462) = 4.174, p < .001, 2 = .051). Further simple effects analysis is shown in Fig 4. The dependent variable was the D-value of motivation between each type of emotioninducing videos and those inducing neutrality. The figure shows that the emotions of sadness, disgust, horror, and anger induced avoidance motivation compared with neutrality, and the emotions of surprise, amusement, and pleasure induced approach motivation compared with neutrality. Gender differences were evidenced by women exhibiting higher avoidance motivation for the horror-inducing videos (M = -3.145, SD = 1.32 versus M = -2.259, SD = 1.782; p < .002) and disgust-inducing videos (M = -3.471, SD = .994 versus M = -2.431, SD = 1.677; p < .002). Table 1 summarizes the gender differences for emotional expressivity and emotional experience for each type of emotion.DiscussionThis study extends previous studies on gender differences in emotional responses evaluated according to emotional experience and emotional expressivity. We observed gender differences in emotional responses and found that they depend on specific emotion types but not valence. Women show relatively stronger emotional expressivity, whereas men have stronger emotional experiences with angry and positive stimuli. The self-report results are identical to those reported in several previous studies. Women often report more intense emotional responses [25], particularly for negative emotions [30]. Women in the present study reported higher arousal compared with men on most emotion types. Women also reported lower valence, higher arousal, and stronger avoidance motivationPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0158666 June 30,7 /Gender Differences in Emotional ResponseFig 4. The D-value of motivation between each type of emotion-inducing videos and those inducing neutrality of men and women. Statistical significance: *p<.002. Unless marked with an asterisk, no significant differences between these groups were found. Dis: disgust, hor: horror, ang: anger, sur: surprise, amu: amusement, ple: pleasure. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158666.gon disgust and horror emotions. The physiological results, such as the decline in HR while watching emotional stimulus, are also highly similar to those reported in previous studies [4,10,11]. This decline reflects the orientation, sustained attention, and action preparation of the viewers [10]. However, regardless of the valence, men exhibited a larger decline in HR than did women. In contrast to our results, Fern dez et al. [3] reported a positive correlation between HR and arousal. In the present study, we found no correlation between the subjective assessmentTable 1. Gender differences for emotional expressivity and emotional experience. emotional expressivity Valence anger amusement pleasure horror disgust sadness surprise "-" means no gender difference. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158666.t001 womenmen women>men women>men women>men women>men women>men Motivation avoidance: women>men avoidance: women>men emotional experience Heart rate decline: men>women decline: men>women decline: men>women -PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0158666 June 30,8 /Gender Differences in Emotional Responsescores and physiological responses, regardless of the type of emotion or the gender of the participant. According to Evers et al. [21], emotional experience and emotional expressivity belong to different reaction systems. The inconsistency between these two aspects is underst.