Lized impetigo infections, the possibilities for autoinoculation, systemic spread and complications, and the spread of disease to close contacts has led many health care providers to treat early with antimicrobial and antibacterial agents. Treatment failures with topical and oral agents are not uncommon and have been shown to be secondary to bacterial resistance (Lee et al., 2005). Resistant strains of bacteria known to cause impetigo, such as methicillinresistant S. aureus (MRSA) and macrolide-resistant S. pyogenes, are becoming more prevalent in an era in which the development and Food and Drug Administration approval of new antibacterial agents has slowed (Kaplan, 2008; LM22A-4 site Kaplan et al., 2005; Spellberg et al., 2004). A study of patients presenting to the emergency departments of 11 major medical centers identified community-acquired MRSA as the most common identifiable cause of skin and soft tissue infections, with an overall prevalence of MRSA at 59 (Moran et al., 2006). A more recent study of multiple centers throughout the United Stated found that MRSA was the cause of 78 of the staphylococcal-related infections of the cutaneous and soft tissues (Gorwitz, 2008). Another recent study, in otherwise healthy children aged 3 months to 18 years treated at Texas Children’s Hospital (Houston, TX) for suspected S. aureus skin and soft tissue infection or invasive infection, examined MRSA colonization rates. MRSA was isolated from clinical cultures in 63 to 70 of children (Kaplan et al., 2014). Resistance to mupirocin among the S. aureus isolates tested in one international study was found to be 6.8 in the United States (Deshpande et al., 2002). Another study performed in the HMPL-012 molecular weight Unites States found mupirocin resistance as high as 24 (Raju et al., 2008). Other studies have reported an increasing resistance of MRSA isolates to common topical agents such as mupirocin and sodium fusidate (Oranje et al., 2007). Further studies have shown multi-drug resistance among MRSA strains (Silverberg and Block, 2008). Past management options for patients affected by impetigo are many and include active nonintervention (observation), sodium hypochlorite baths, over-the-counter topical agents, topical antibacterials, and oral antibacterials (Bangert et al., 2012). Shorter duration of disease has been shown with several treatment options (Bernard, 2008; Cole and Gazewood, 2007; Koning et al., 2012), although observation alone may be reasonable given that spontaneous resolution without sequelae is common inside of a few weeks without treatment (Bangert et al.,2012). More studies are needed to determine if treating persons who are actively infected can lead to a decrease in the incidence of poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis compared with observation alone. The risk for transmission of infection to close contacts and systemic spread is not altered by active nonintervention. For this reason, among others, topical antibacterial medications remain the treatment of choice for those with limited skin disease (Bangert et al., 2012). The two most common agents that have been used by physicians to treat impetigo throughout the world are fusidic acid and mupirocin (Bangert et al., 2012). Mupirocin has been prescribed to eradicate colonization with S. aureus in the nares and works by inhibiting bacterial isoleucyl-t-RNA synthetase, while fusidic acid exerts its antibacterial action through inhibition of bacterial protein synthesis (Bangert et al., 2012). Emerging resi.Lized impetigo infections, the possibilities for autoinoculation, systemic spread and complications, and the spread of disease to close contacts has led many health care providers to treat early with antimicrobial and antibacterial agents. Treatment failures with topical and oral agents are not uncommon and have been shown to be secondary to bacterial resistance (Lee et al., 2005). Resistant strains of bacteria known to cause impetigo, such as methicillinresistant S. aureus (MRSA) and macrolide-resistant S. pyogenes, are becoming more prevalent in an era in which the development and Food and Drug Administration approval of new antibacterial agents has slowed (Kaplan, 2008; Kaplan et al., 2005; Spellberg et al., 2004). A study of patients presenting to the emergency departments of 11 major medical centers identified community-acquired MRSA as the most common identifiable cause of skin and soft tissue infections, with an overall prevalence of MRSA at 59 (Moran et al., 2006). A more recent study of multiple centers throughout the United Stated found that MRSA was the cause of 78 of the staphylococcal-related infections of the cutaneous and soft tissues (Gorwitz, 2008). Another recent study, in otherwise healthy children aged 3 months to 18 years treated at Texas Children’s Hospital (Houston, TX) for suspected S. aureus skin and soft tissue infection or invasive infection, examined MRSA colonization rates. MRSA was isolated from clinical cultures in 63 to 70 of children (Kaplan et al., 2014). Resistance to mupirocin among the S. aureus isolates tested in one international study was found to be 6.8 in the United States (Deshpande et al., 2002). Another study performed in the Unites States found mupirocin resistance as high as 24 (Raju et al., 2008). Other studies have reported an increasing resistance of MRSA isolates to common topical agents such as mupirocin and sodium fusidate (Oranje et al., 2007). Further studies have shown multi-drug resistance among MRSA strains (Silverberg and Block, 2008). Past management options for patients affected by impetigo are many and include active nonintervention (observation), sodium hypochlorite baths, over-the-counter topical agents, topical antibacterials, and oral antibacterials (Bangert et al., 2012). Shorter duration of disease has been shown with several treatment options (Bernard, 2008; Cole and Gazewood, 2007; Koning et al., 2012), although observation alone may be reasonable given that spontaneous resolution without sequelae is common inside of a few weeks without treatment (Bangert et al.,2012). More studies are needed to determine if treating persons who are actively infected can lead to a decrease in the incidence of poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis compared with observation alone. The risk for transmission of infection to close contacts and systemic spread is not altered by active nonintervention. For this reason, among others, topical antibacterial medications remain the treatment of choice for those with limited skin disease (Bangert et al., 2012). The two most common agents that have been used by physicians to treat impetigo throughout the world are fusidic acid and mupirocin (Bangert et al., 2012). Mupirocin has been prescribed to eradicate colonization with S. aureus in the nares and works by inhibiting bacterial isoleucyl-t-RNA synthetase, while fusidic acid exerts its antibacterial action through inhibition of bacterial protein synthesis (Bangert et al., 2012). Emerging resi.