Nal, social support, or the expectancy effects. Additionally, participants might have been in concurrent psychotherapy outside of the study, which may have influenced outcomes. That said, the fact that time spent in mindfulness practice was correlated with improvements in post-traumatic stress symptoms suggests that mindfulness training may have played a key role in producing therapeutic change. In addition, the study was limited by lack of a follow-up measurement point. Although participation in TI-MBSR was associated with significant changes in posttraumatic stress and depressive symptoms, the duration of these changes are unknown. All therapeutic change was measured via self-report, which may be biased and may not accurately measure clinical outcomes. Also, the study lacked quantitative measurement of treatment fidelity: therapist adherence and competence was not evaluated. Lastly, the study was limited by its small sample size, which may detract from the generalizability of study findings, as well as constrain statistical power. That said, significant effects were obtained despite the modest sample. Future studies might profitably employ a three-arm dismantling design with 6- and 12-month follow-ups, randomizing women with IPV to TI-MBSR, traditional MBSR, or a social support group to disentangle the differential therapeutic effects of trauma-informed content from standard mindfulness skills and non-specific therapeutic factors. We found that TI-MBSR was feasible to implement with few resources and acceptable to participants with low incomes. TI-MBSR can be offered in most settings, even those with comparatively limited resources – for example, in prison settings where there are high rates of IPV and traumatization among incarcerated women. Given that MBSR has begun to be implemented in such settings (Samuelson, OPC-8212 side effects Carmody, Kabbat-Zinn, Bratt, 2007; Himelstein, 2011; Perkins, 1998), more research is needed to determine if it would be beneficial to modify the mindfulness training programs already being offered by integrating specific psychoeducation on trauma and therapeutic techniques informed by the trauma literature. In sum, TI-MBSR appears to be a promising Phase-I intervention for female survivors of IPV. Clinically significant improvements in post-traumatic stress and depressive symptoms were observed, and anxious attachment significantly decreased following this relatively briefAuthor Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptJ Clin Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 April 01.Kelly and GarlandPageintervention. More treatment development research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms and long-term effects of this therapeutic approach.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAcknowledgmentsThis research was supported by a 1440 Grant from the Mind Life Institute awarded to AK and ELG. Additionally, it was supported through the Smith College School for Social Pan-RAS-IN-1MedChemExpress Pan-RAS-IN-1 Work’s Clinical Research Institute awarded to AK. ELG was also supported by NIDA Grant R34DA037005 in preparing this manuscript.
Although group identity has been a concept of interest to social scientists for some time (Gurin, Miller, Gurin, 1980; Miller et al., 1981; Olsen, 1970; Verba Nie, 1972; Shingles 1981), scholars have recently expanded our understanding of how group*Corresponding author: Edward D. Vargas, Center for Women’s Health and Health Disparities Research, University of WisconsinMadison, IR.Nal, social support, or the expectancy effects. Additionally, participants might have been in concurrent psychotherapy outside of the study, which may have influenced outcomes. That said, the fact that time spent in mindfulness practice was correlated with improvements in post-traumatic stress symptoms suggests that mindfulness training may have played a key role in producing therapeutic change. In addition, the study was limited by lack of a follow-up measurement point. Although participation in TI-MBSR was associated with significant changes in posttraumatic stress and depressive symptoms, the duration of these changes are unknown. All therapeutic change was measured via self-report, which may be biased and may not accurately measure clinical outcomes. Also, the study lacked quantitative measurement of treatment fidelity: therapist adherence and competence was not evaluated. Lastly, the study was limited by its small sample size, which may detract from the generalizability of study findings, as well as constrain statistical power. That said, significant effects were obtained despite the modest sample. Future studies might profitably employ a three-arm dismantling design with 6- and 12-month follow-ups, randomizing women with IPV to TI-MBSR, traditional MBSR, or a social support group to disentangle the differential therapeutic effects of trauma-informed content from standard mindfulness skills and non-specific therapeutic factors. We found that TI-MBSR was feasible to implement with few resources and acceptable to participants with low incomes. TI-MBSR can be offered in most settings, even those with comparatively limited resources – for example, in prison settings where there are high rates of IPV and traumatization among incarcerated women. Given that MBSR has begun to be implemented in such settings (Samuelson, Carmody, Kabbat-Zinn, Bratt, 2007; Himelstein, 2011; Perkins, 1998), more research is needed to determine if it would be beneficial to modify the mindfulness training programs already being offered by integrating specific psychoeducation on trauma and therapeutic techniques informed by the trauma literature. In sum, TI-MBSR appears to be a promising Phase-I intervention for female survivors of IPV. Clinically significant improvements in post-traumatic stress and depressive symptoms were observed, and anxious attachment significantly decreased following this relatively briefAuthor Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptJ Clin Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 April 01.Kelly and GarlandPageintervention. More treatment development research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms and long-term effects of this therapeutic approach.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAcknowledgmentsThis research was supported by a 1440 Grant from the Mind Life Institute awarded to AK and ELG. Additionally, it was supported through the Smith College School for Social Work’s Clinical Research Institute awarded to AK. ELG was also supported by NIDA Grant R34DA037005 in preparing this manuscript.
Although group identity has been a concept of interest to social scientists for some time (Gurin, Miller, Gurin, 1980; Miller et al., 1981; Olsen, 1970; Verba Nie, 1972; Shingles 1981), scholars have recently expanded our understanding of how group*Corresponding author: Edward D. Vargas, Center for Women’s Health and Health Disparities Research, University of WisconsinMadison, IR.